英語六級閲讀理解的參考練習題

在大學英語六級考試的閲讀理解部分的備考，考生要多做一些參考練習題。為此本站小編為大家帶來大學英語六級考試的閲讀理解的參考練習題目。

The Homosexual Family

Although many people do not think of homosexual relationships as resulting in a family, it has been estimated that about one of five gays and one of three lesbians enter a homosexual marriage. The marriage may or may not be established by a formal ceremony. One male couple , for example , after four months of cohabitation3, went to Mass4 and let the service be their private ceremony of commitment. They used the term marriage to describe their relationship. They bought matching rings and verbally agreed to be sexually faithful, to emotionally support each other, and to have equal say in such matters as finances.

Moreover, millions of gays and lesbians have had children. In many cases, the children were born when the individual was part of a heterosexual marriage . Subsequently, the individual openly acknowledged his or her homosexual preference. Some of these children are being raised in a homosexual family — two men, two women, or some other arrangement. For example, Nancy is a lesbian who is raising a daughter with two gay males, one of whom is the child’s father.

Homosexual couples have to work through the same problems as heterosexual couples. They face issues of household division of labor, power, sexual relationships, and money. In addition, like the interracial couple , they face problems arising from being in a socially stigmatized relationship. Gallup polls5 that asked the American public whether homosexual relations between consenting adults should be legal have found an increasing proportion from the mid-1970s to the late 1990s who said that they should not be legal. Homosexual families, then, must not only deal with the same issues as other families but also with a hostile environment and with some problems that are unique to6 the homosexual relationship .

閲讀自測

Ⅰ. Are these statements True or False according to the article ?

1. Like heterosexual marriage, homosexual marriage must go through a formal ceremony.

2. Most of the children of homosexuals are adopted from other places.

3. Homosexual couples just have to confront the same problems as heterosexual couples.

4. Homosexual couples have to overcome various problems and still have a long way to go .

5. From the mid-1970s, homosexual marriages are gradually accepted by our society.

Ⅱ. Choose the best answer to fill in the blanks :

1. The tax increases in ______to the amount you earn.

A. accordance B. proportion C. ratio D. scale

2. There are some matters ______ from the recent changes in the law.

A. raising B. happening C. arising D. rising

3. The father is not willing to consent ______ the marriage.

A. to B. from C. with D. in

參考答案

Ⅰ. 1. F 2. F 3 . F 4. T 5. F

Ⅱ. 1. B 2. C 3 . A

參考譯文

同性戀家庭

儘管許多人認為同性戀關係不能使兩個同性戀者組成一個家庭, 但據估計大約每五個男同性戀者中就有一個會與同性結婚, 而每三個女同性戀者中則會有一個與同性結婚。同性戀者的婚姻關係也許會通過正式的儀式得以確認, 也許根本就不通過正式儀式。比如説, 一對男同性戀者同居四個月以後, 會去教堂望彌撒, 他們將這種宗教活動作為互相托付終身的私人儀式。他們用結婚這個詞來描述他們之間的關係。他們還買了情侶戒指, 信誓旦旦在性關係上忠於對方, 感情方面互為支持, 而且表示在家庭財政等方面擁有平等的發言權。此外, 許許多多的男女同性戀者都有孩子。在許多情況下, 這些孩子是同性戀者在以前的異性戀婚姻中的結晶。後來, 這個同性戀者在公開場合裏承認了他或她的同性戀傾向。一些孩子在同性戀家庭裏得到撫養——— 家裏或有兩個男人, 或有兩個女人, 抑或是其他某種家庭構成。舉例來説, 南希是一名女同性戀者, 她與兩個男同性戀者共同撫養了一個女兒, 這兩個男同性戀中有一個人就是這個孩子的生父。

同性戀伴侶和異性戀伴侶一樣要克服相同的困難。他們要面對家庭勞動分工、家庭權力、性關係和金錢等問題。另外, 像那些與不同種族的人結合的伴侶一樣, 同性戀伴侶還要面對因社會對同性戀關係的歧視所引發的其他問題。曾有一次蓋洛普民意測驗, 調查美國公眾對情投意合的成年人之間的同性戀關係是否合法的觀點, 結果發現從20 世紀70 年代中期到90 年代末, 認為同性戀關係不合法的人數比例在不斷攀升。因此, 同性戀家庭不僅要應付與其他家庭相同的問題, 而且還要面對一個充滿敵意的社會環境, 並應付同性戀關係。

10 Ways Obama Could Fight Climate Change

[A] One of the biggest surprises of President Barack Obama's inaugural address,on Monday was how much he focused on fighting climate change, spending more time on that issue than any other. "We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations," Obama said. The President pointed out that recent severe weather supplied an urgent impetus for energy innovation and staked the nation's economic future on responding to a changing climate. "We cannot cede to other nations the technology that will power new jobs and new industries--we must claim its promise," Obama said. '" That's how we will maintain our economic vitality and our national treasure--our forests and waterways; our croplands and snowcapped (山頂積雪的) peaks. That is how we will preserve our planet, commanded to our care by God. " so what could the President reasonably do to deliver on that vow? Here are ten of their suggestions:

Sunset coal with new incentives and regulations.

[B] "Provide incentives to phase out the oldest, most polluting power plants," said Robert Jackson, a climate scientist at Duke University. It's already happening, to some degree, as more of the nation transitions to natural gas. Earth scientist Bill Chameides, dean of Duke's Nicholas School of the Environment and a former chief scientist at the Environmental Defense Fund, urges the administration to use its Clean, Air Act authority to promulgate (頒佈 )carbon regulations for existing power plants like it has for new ones: "Doing that will force fuel switching from coal to natural gas. "Invest federal stimulus money in nuclear power.

[C] It's hardly a perfect fuel, as accidents like Japan's Fukushima fallout have shown, but with safety precautions new nuclear plants can meaningfully offset dirtier types of energy, supporters say."Nuclear is the only short-to medium-term way to really get away from fossil fuels," said Peter Raven. President emeritus of the Missouri Botanical Garden. He said the damage done by relentless global warming will far exceed the damage done by faults in the nuclear system.

Kill the Keystone pipeline.

[D] The controversial Keystone XL oil pipeline is up for review again by the White House this year. "The font thing he should do to set the tone to a lower carbon economy is to reject the Keystone pipeline, “said Raymond Pierrehum Bert, a geophysical scientist at the University of Chicago. The pipeline was never going to be a major driver of global emissions, but Pierre humbert and some other environmentalists say that by killing it the President would send a clear message about America's intent to ramp down fossil fuels.

Protect the oceans by executive order.

[E] Land use is complicated, but large swaths of oceans can be protected by executive order. Just as President George W. Bush designated the world's largest marine monument northwest of Hawaii in 2006. Obama could single-handedly protect other areas. National Geographic Explorer-in-Residence Sylvia Earle said the President should focus on parts of the Arctic that are under U. S. control, putting them off limits to energy production, commercial fishing, and mineral exploration. Marine sanctuaries (禁捕區) won't stop climate change, but they can give marine species a better chance of adapting to it by reducing the other man-made threats the animals face.

Experiment with capturing carbon.

[F] Huge untapped reserves of natural gas and oil make it unlikely that the U. S. will transition away from fossil fuels in the immediate future. Instead, said Wallace Broecker, geology professor at Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, we should attack the atmosphere's carbon surplus directly. "Obama could make available funds to build and test prototype air capture units" to capture and store CO2, said Broecker. Removing some carbon from the atmosphere could buy valuable time as policy makers and scientists explore more permanent solutions.

Grow government research for new energy sources.

[G] The Department of Energy has a nimble program that's tasked with innovative energy research—the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy. The ARPA-E funds research in biofuels, transmission,and battery storage, with an annual budget of $ 275 million. Last year, DOE officials requested at least $ 75 million more. Increasing funding for ARPA-E, said Rare Pomerance, former deputy assistant secretary of state for environment and development and currently an environmental consultant, "you get new technologies that undercut coal, oil, and gas. " Plus, he said, yon get a competitive advantage if American researchers uncover the next big idea in new energy.

Tax carbon.

[H] Congress would have to agree, but many climate experts say that the most meaningful way to tackle emissions is to set a price on carbon. "We should be asking people to pay the cost of putting carbon into the atmosphere as they buy the fuel," said Josh Willis, climate scientist and oceanographer at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. To gain political support for the idea, Obama would probably have to show that the tax wonld help accelerate technology, grow new industries, and pay down the deficit.

Dial back the federal government's energy use.

[I] With more than I. 8 million employees, $ 500 billion in annual purchasing power, and 500,000 buildings to operate, the federal government has been a leader in reducing energy use since Obama signed a 2009 executive order to cut waste. "I would urge him to keep using the power of government to promote energy conservation," said Syndonia Bret-Harte, an Arctic biologist who studies climate change at the University of Alaska, Fairbanks.

Build a scientific clearinghouse for climate information.

[J] "I advocate for building a better information system on what is happening and why," said Kevin Tren berth, head of the Climate Analysis Section at the U. S. National Center for Atmospheric Research. That involves compiling observations related to climate change from around the world and using the data to refine climate modeling. Think of it as a one-stop, user-friendly website that clearly demonstrates how weather data from around the globe are influenced by broader shifts in the planet's climate.

Keep talking. Despite a consensus among top scientists, the world still needs some convincing on climate change.

[K] A CNN poll last week found that just 49 percent of Americans agree that global warming is real and is due to human activities. "The most important thing the President can do is to build on his inaugural comments to heighten the sense of urgency about rapid climate destabilization and clarify its connection to virtually every other issue on the national agenda," said David Orr, environmental studies professor at Oberlin College. That means using the bully clergymen to show how a more volatile climate affects everything from agriculture to transportation to 21st-century warfare.

第一，我們要掃讀全文，確定文章的大概結構。

如何掃讀全文呢重點去讀文章的第一段，如果各部分有小標題，還要讀一下各部分的小標題，如果無小標題，則掃讀每段的首句，這樣做的目的就是為了把握文章的大意和總體結構，同時也能快速的得出後面主旨題的答案。

第二，要將考查題目與原文相對應。

六級考試與考研英語一樣，在題目的設置上呈現出出題順序與行文順序一致的規律。最後一題的答案定位信息點一般不可能在第一段或前面幾段出現。所以我們按順序把每一道題目題幹中的定位詞先劃出來，再按段落順序依次去定位。

那麼，何為定位詞呢?通常分為兩類：第一類是表時間、數字及首字母大寫的人名地名等專有名詞;第二類是比較長，比較複雜的名詞;這裏切記，不能用表達中心思想的主題詞去定位，因為文章通篇講的都是它。由於問題順序和文章行文順序一致，所以先做第一小題，然後做第二小題，看一道，做一道。千萬不要把文章全部看完後再做題，或者全部題目看完後再讀文章。

在將題目和文章比對的同時，要善於學會精讀重點信息。比如，文中舉例處，引語及多個名詞並列而不是完整句子的內容，均可略讀。此外，要多關注文中的邏輯關係詞，對於這些詞的把握，有助於我們精確把握重要信息。通常要注意下面三種邏輯關係：

(1)並列、遞進關係：and，or，besides，furthermore，what’s more，then，in addition，moreover，in other words;

(2)因果關係：as a result of，on account of ，as a result ，thanks to，therefore，hence，consequently，because，for，due to，owing to;

(3)轉折關係：whereas，however，but，nevertheless，yet，in fact;

最後，要學會運用特殊的標點符號，比如冒號，破折號，小括號。這些標點符號的出現就是對前面的內容作進一步的説明。所以，在閲讀文章時，可以跳讀這些標點符號後面的信息，從而幫助我們節省更多寶貴的時間並且更加快速地把握文章的主旨。

第三，精煉原文，學會概括。

快速閲讀除了選擇題之外，還會有兩到三個填空題。對於填空題，我們所要做的是首先確定所缺內容是句子的什麼成分，然後根據具體定位信息回到原文去確定所缺內容。要學會去照抄原文或者對原文內容進行概括總結，以確保所填內容信息的完整性和準確性。