死刑廢存英語演講稿

Capital punishment is a traditional punishment. In history, many rulers took the capital punishment as an important tool to deal with those who most seriously opposed their domination. In those days, capital punishment was right and proper. However, its function and existence start becoming questionable after having been applied for thousand years. This essay will argue that capital punishment should not be abolished.

First and foremost, capital punishment indicates the government’s attitude towards crimes. When a criminal’s guilt attains to a certain extend, it will be unacceptable for the whole society on both moral and legal grounds. Then the government should and must sentence the criminal to death. Only in this way can the government proves that they are capable and responsible.

Furthermore, the deterrent effect of other punishments is incomparable with that of capital punishment. Capital punishment is an extremely frightening word for most people. Based on this point, a criminal may stop halfway as soon as he thinks up that death is the most likely outcome of his criminal acts. In addition, the existence of capital punishment brings people the concept that the killers must pay for their crimes. And this concept can leave generations.

Last but not least, the feeling of the victims’ family must be taken into consideration. In many most serious cases, the victims mostly have dead, leaving irreparable injuries on their family. Proved that the capital punishment is abolished, the flagitious criminals are just sent to jail, being alive without worry about foods and

clothing. This is so cruel to the victims’ family that it may induce them to do something crazily, which is bad for both criminals and victims’ family.

In conclusion, capital punishment’s existence in modern civilized society is not occasional, because its powerful function is incomparable. Therefore, capital punishment should be kept to continue playing its important role in stabilizing society.