2017雅思作文
有些人認為政府應該給像畫家和音樂家這樣的有創造力的藝術家提供經濟支持。其他人認為，創意藝術家應該由其他來源資助。討論兩種觀點並給出你自己的觀點。下面是小編整理的關於藝術家的雅思作文，大家可以參考參考。
Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
範文：
People have different views about the funding of creative artists. While some people disagree with the idea of government support for artists, I believe that money for art projects should come from both governments and other sources.
Some art projects definitely require help from the state. In the UK, there are many works of art in public spaces, such as streets or squares in city centres. In Liverpool, for example, there are several new statues and sculptures in the docks area of the city, which has been redeveloped recently. These artworks represent culture, heritage and history. They serve to educate people about the city, and act as landmarks or talking points for visitors and tourists. Governments and local councils should pay creative artists to produce this kind of art, because without their funding our cities would be much less interesting and attractive.
On the other hand, I can understand the arguments against government funding for art. The main reason for this view is that governments have more important concerns. For example, state budgets need to be spent on education, healthcare, infrastructure and security, among other areas. These public services are vital for a country to function properly, whereas the work of creative artists, even in public places, is a luxury. Another reason for this opinion is that artists do a job like any other professional, and they should therefore earn their own money by selling their work.
In conclusion, there are good reasons why artists should rely on alternative sources of financial support, but in my opinion government help is sometimes necessary.
參考翻譯
人們對創意藝術家的資助有不同的看法。雖然有些人不同意政府支持藝術家的想法，但我認為藝術項目的錢應該來自政府和其他來源。
一些藝術項目肯定需要國家的幫助。在英國，公共場所有許多藝術作品，例如城市中心的街道或廣場。在利物浦，例如，有在城市的'碼頭區的幾個新的雕塑，已開發的最近。這些藝術品代表着文化、遺產和歷史。它們服務於人們瞭解城市，併為遊客和遊客充當地標或談話點。政府和地方議會應該支付創造性的藝術家生產這種藝術，因為沒有他們的資金，我們的城市會少得多有趣和有吸引力。
另一方面，我可以理解反對政府資助藝術的論點。這種觀點的主要原因是政府有更重要的關注點。例如，國家預算需要花費在教育，醫療保健，基礎設施和安全，以及其他領域。這些公共服務對一個國家的正常運轉至關重要，而創造性藝術家的工作，即使在公共場所，也是一種奢侈品。這種觀點的另一個原因是，藝術家做任何其他專業的工作，因此，他們應該賺取自己的錢出售他們的工作。
總之，藝術家們應該依賴於其他來源的財政支持，有充分的理由，但在我看來，政府的幫助有時是必要的。
