雅思帶翻譯的社會類作文範文

大城市的交通和住房問題可以通過把大公司、工廠和他們的員工搬到農村來解決。你同意還是不同意這個觀點?下面是小編整理的雅思社會類作文，大家可以參考參考。

Traffic and housing problems in major cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories and their employees to the countryside.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

　　Model Answer:

These days with increasing urban populations, there are major problems with congestion and not only the price, but also availability of accommodation in large cities of the world. It seems that one possible solution could be to relocate large companies and factories as well as their respective employees out of these urban areas and into more rural ones. In my opinion, I strongly agree that this would have a desired effect in making cities more livable.

To begin with, the traffic problem in cities doesn’t only exist from commuting employees, but also the general public travelling around the city. While this may be a fact, if the number of worker’s vehicles is reduced on city streets, a large percentage of traffic will obviously decline in rush hours. For example, peak hour traffic is undoubtedly made up largely of staff from companies going to and from home.

Secondly, in regards to housing problems, populations will always continue to grow in cities and therefore inadvertently decrease the number of cheap and available apartments. This is certainly obvious, however, a large proportion of these apartments are occupied by employees from large firms and their families. If this workforce is relocated to housing estates in the country, city apartment blocks will fall in price and certainly increase in availability.

In conclusion, by relocating workers to rural areas to work and reside, heavy traffic conditions and lack of adequate accommodation in city centres will obviously change for the better. As far as I’m concerned, I agree that the government should enforce such a law in order to increase our standard of living in our hectic city life.

　　參考翻譯：

如今，隨着城市人口的增加，擁擠的問題不僅是價格，還有世界各大城市的住宿供應。看來，一個可能的解決辦法是將大公司和工廠以及他們各自的員工從這些城市地區轉移到更多的農村地區。在我看來，我強烈同意，這將有理想的效果，使城市更宜居。

首先，城市的交通問題不僅存在於通勤員工，也包括城市周邊的普通市民。雖然這可能是一個事實，如果工人車輛的數量減少在城市街道上，大量的交通將明顯下降高峯時間。例如，高峯時段的交通無疑是由上下班公司的員工組成的。

其次，在住房問題上，人口將繼續在城市增長，因此在不經意間減少廉價和可用的公寓的數量。這當然是顯而易見的，但是，這些公寓的很大一部分是由大公司和他們的家庭的員工佔用。如果勞動力轉移到該國的房地產，城市公寓將價格下降，並肯定增加可用性。

總之，通過搬遷工人到農村地區工作、居住、交通條件和城市中心缺乏足夠的住宿將明顯好轉。就我而言，我同意政府應執行這樣的法律，以提高我們繁忙的城市生活的生活水平。

Families who do not send their children to government-financed schools should not be required to pay taxes that support universal education.

　　Model Answer 1: (Agree)

Families who do not send their children to government-financed school should not be required to pay taxes that support universal education.

When families send their children to non-public (that is, parochial and private) schools, they must pay tuition and other school expenses. Spending additional money to pay taxes creates an even greater financial hardship for these families. They must make sacrifices, trying to have enough money to pay for school in addition to other bills. For example, my friend Amalia is a single mother with an eight-year-old son, Andrew. Because they survive solely on her income, money is tight. Amalia works at least 10 hours of overtime each week to cover Andrew's school expenses. This gives Amalia and Andrew less time to spend together, and she is always so tired that she is impatient with him when they do have family time. Clearly, this extra expense is an unfair burden for hard-working parents like Amalia.

While some people may consider parochial or private school to be a luxury, for many families it is essential because their community's public schools fail to meet their children's needs. Unfortunately, due to shrinking budgets, many schools lack well-qualified, experienced educators. Children may be taught by someone who is not a certified teacher or who knows little about the subject matter. Some problems are even more serious. For example, the public high school in my old neighborhood/neighbourhood had serious safety problems, due to students bringing guns, drugs, and alcohol to school. After a gang-related shooting occurred at the high school, my parents felt that they had no choice but to enroll me in a parochial school that was known for being very safe.

Unfortunately, even when families prefer public schools, sometimes they can't send their children to one. These families are burdened not only for paying expenses at another school, but also by being forced to pay taxes to support a public school that they do not use.

　　參考翻譯

不把孩子送到政府資助學校的家庭不應該繳納支持全民教育的税款。

當家庭送子女到非公有制(即教會和私人)的學校，他們必須支付學費和其它雜費。花更多的錢交税會給這些家庭帶來更大的經濟困難。他們必須作出犧牲，試圖有足夠的錢支付學校除了其他法案。例如，我的朋友阿馬利婭是一個八歲的兒子的單身母親，安得烈。因為他們靠她的收入生存，錢很緊。阿馬利婭的作品至少10個小時每星期加班把安得烈的學費。這給了阿馬利婭和安得烈在一起的時間少了，她總是那麼的累，她急着跟他當他們家庭時間。顯然，這個額外的費用是勤勞的父母像阿馬利婭這樣一個不公平的負擔。

雖然有些人可能認為教會或私立學校是一種奢侈品，很多家庭是很重要的因為他們的社區的公立學校不能滿足孩子的需求。不幸的是，由於預算縮水，許多學校缺乏合格的，有經驗的教育工作者。孩子可能是由一個不是認證老師或對主題知之甚少的人教的。有些問題更嚴重。例如，在我的舊社區/附近的公立高中有嚴重的安全問題，由於學生攜帶槍支，毒品和酒精到學校。在幫派槍擊發生的高中，我父母覺得他們別無選擇，但讓我在教會學校被認為是非常安全的'。

不幸的是，即使家庭喜歡公立學校，有時他們也不能把孩子送到一所學校。這些家庭不僅負擔在另一所學校支付費用，而且還被迫納税，以支持一所公立學校，他們不使用。

　　Model Answer 2: (Disagree)

Families who do not send their children to public school should be required to pay taxes that support public education.

Every child in my country is required to attend school and every child is welcome to enroll at his/her local public school. Some families choose to send their children to other schools, and it is their prerogative to do so. However, the public schools are used by the majority of our children and must remain open for everyone. For example, my uncle sent his two children to a private academy for primary school. Then he lost a huge amount of money through some poor investments and he could no longer afford the private school's tuition. The children easily transferred to their local public school and liked it even more than their academy. The public schools supported their family when they had no money to educate their children.

Because the public schools educate so many citizens, everyone in my country-whether a parent or not-should pay taxes to support our educational system. We all benefit from the education that students receive in public school. Our future doctors, fire fighters, and teacherspeople whom we rely on everyday-are educated in local public schools. When a person is in trouble, it's reassuring to know that those who will help you-such as fire fighters-know what they're doing because they received good training in school and later. Providing an excellent education in the public school system is vital to the strength of our community and our country.

Our government must offer the best education available, but it can only do so with the financial assistance of all its citizens. Therefore, everyone-including families who do not send their children to public school-should support public education by paying taxes.

　　參考翻譯

不把孩子送到公立學校的家庭應該被要求繳納支持公共教育的税款。

我們國家的每一個孩子都要上學，每個孩子都歡迎在當地的公立學校就讀。一些家庭選擇送孩子去其他學校，這是他們的特權。然而，公立學校是由我們的大多數孩子使用，必須保持開放。例如，我叔叔把他的兩個孩子送到一所私立學校上國小。然後，他失去了大量的錢通過一些可憐的投資，他再也不能負擔私立學校的學費。孩子們很容易地轉到當地的公立學校，甚至比他們的學院更喜歡它。當沒有錢教育孩子的時候，公立學校支持他們的家庭。

因為公立學校教育了這麼多的公民，我們國家的每個人不管父母是否應該交税來支持我們的教育制度。我們都受益於公立學校接受的教育。我們未來的醫生、消防戰士，和teacherspeople我們依靠每天都在當地的公立學校教育。當一個人陷入困境時，要知道那些會幫助你的人，比如消防隊員知道他們在做什麼，因為他們在學校得到了很好的訓練，後來。在公立學校系統中提供良好的教育對我們社會和國家的力量是至關重要的。

我們的政府必須提供最好的教育，但它只能在所有公民的經濟援助。因此，每個人，包括不把孩子送到公立學校的家庭都應該通過納税來支持公共教育。