雅思作文帶翻譯的範文

有些人認為，把一門語言作為國際官方語言是很重要的。其他人認為，這將導致其他國家的文化造成損失。你對此有何看法?下面是小編整理的雅思社會類作文，大家可以參考參考。

Some people think that it is important to have a single language as an international official language. Others think that it will make it difficult to identify countries and cause a loss of culture.

What are your opinions on this?

　　Model Answer:

With the advent of globalization, a common language to facilitate trade and communication seems inevitable. Some oppose the development of a single language on the grounds that it may lead to cultural erosion and a loss of local linguistic knowledge. Yet, I am of the opinion that it is possible to use an official international language and still retain one’s own language and culture.

Firstly, many countries already use an official language or languages. For example, in India there are two official languages: Hindi and English. In a country such as India where there are innumerable languages spoken, there is a need for official languages to ensure communication between different sections of the population and the different states. In China, where different dialects are spoken, Mandarin, the official language, enables people from different provinces to comprehend each other.

Secondly, in an age of rampant globalization there is no doubt that an international language is inevitability. How is an African businessman going to conduct business in China when there are such differences between languages? In this sense, not only is an international language inevitable, but also a necessity for trade, commerce and economic expansion in the 21st century.

The critics opposing the adoption of an international official language argue that it would lead to a loss of cultural identity. However, the use of an international official language doesn’t mean that local languages will die out. For example, English already functions as a kind of unofficial international language but this doesn’t mean that people solely converse in English or they neglect their own language. English is used in specific contexts (trade, business, etc) and native languages are used for everyday instruction.

In brief, as the world becomes smaller the need for an official international language seems unavoidable. English has already assumed this role although its status is unofficial. In my view, the use of either an official or unofficial international language is necessary to facilitate communication in a time of rapid globalization.

　　參考翻譯

隨着全球化的到來，促進貿易和交流的共同語言似乎不可避免。一些人反對發展單一語言，理由是它可能導致文化侵蝕和當地語言知識的喪失。然而，我認為可以使用官方的國際語言，仍然保留自己的語言和文化。

首先，許多國家已經使用官方語言或語言。例如，在印度有兩種官方語言，印地語和英語。在印度這樣一個語言眾多的國家，有必要使用官方語言來確保不同人口和不同國家之間的交流。在中國，不同的方言，普通話，官方語言，使來自不同省份的人互相理解。

其次，在一個全球化的時代，毫無疑問，一種國際語言是不可避免的。一個非洲商人是如何在中國當有這種語言差異開展業務?從這個意義上説，不僅是國際語言的必然，也是第二十一世紀貿易、商業和經濟發展的必然要求。

反對採用國際官方語言的批評者認為這會導致文化身份的喪失。然而，使用國際官方語言並不意味着當地語言將消亡。例如，英語已經成為一種非官方的國際語言，但這並不意味着人們只會用英語交談或忽視自己的語言。英語用於特定的上下文(貿易，商業等)和母語用於日常教學。

簡言之，隨着世界變得越來越小，對官方語言的需求似乎不可避免。英語已經承擔了這個角色，儘管它的地位是非官方的。我認為，在全球化迅速發展的時代，使用官方或非官方的國際語言對促進溝通是必要的。

Research indicates that the characteristics we are born with have much more influence on our personality and development than any experiences we may have in our life.

Which do you consider to be the major influence?

　　Model Answer:

Today the way we consider human psychology and mental development is heavily influenced by the genetic sciences. We now understand the importance of inherited characteristics more than ever before. Yet we are still unable to decide whether an individual’s personality and development are more influenced by genetic factors (nature) or by the environment (nurture).

Research, relating to identical twins, has highlighted how significant inherited characteristics can be for an individual's life. But whether these characteristics are able to develop within the personality of an individual surely depends on whether the circumstances allow such a development. It seems that the experiences we have in life are so unpredictable and so powerful, that they can boost or over-ride other influences, and there seems to be plenty of research findings to confirm this.

My own view is that there is no one major influence in a person's life. Instead, the traits we inherit from our parents and the situation and experiences that we encounter in life are constantly interacting. It is the interaction of the two that shapes a person's personality and dictates how that personality develops. If this were not true, we would be able to predict the behavior and character of a person from the moment they were born.

In conclusion, I do not think that either nature or nurture is the major influence on a person, but that both have powerful effects. How these factors interact is still unknown today and they remain largely unpredictable in a person’s life.

　　參考翻譯：

今天，我們認為人類心理和心智發展的方式受到遺傳科學的嚴重影響。我們現在比以前更瞭解遺傳特徵的重要性。然而，我們仍然不能決定一個人的個性和發展是否更受遺傳因素(自然)或環境(培育)。

有關同卵雙胞胎的研究強調了遺傳特徵對於個體生活的重要性。但是，這些特徵是否能夠在一個人的個性發展，肯定取決於情況是否允許這樣的發展。看來，我們在生活中的經驗是如此不可預測的和強大的，他們可以推動或過度乘坐其他影響，似乎有大量的研究結果來證實這一點。

我自己的觀點是，人的'一生中沒有一個重要的影響。相反，我們從父母身上繼承的特質和我們在生活中遇到的情況和經歷總是相互作用的。正是這兩者的相互作用塑造了一個人的個性，並決定了這個人格的發展。如果這不是真的，那麼我們就能從一個人出生的時候就預測出一個人的行為和性格。

總之，我不認為自然或教養對人的影響很大，但兩者都有強大的影響。這些因素如何相互作用至今仍不清楚，它們在一個人的生活中基本上是不可預測的。